Report Card Summary
| Tool | NAME OF TOOL |
| Version | 0.0.00 |
| Date | YEAR-MM-DD |
| Assessment Team | Names and/or Links |
| Current Assessment | Research Grade |
| Target Status |
Professional Grade |
| Riverscapes Compliance |
Riverscapes Compliant |
| Assessment Rationale | 1-3 Sentence Summary by reviewers justifying assessment determination and summarizing from details below. |
Report Card Details
This tool's discrimination evaluation by the Riverscapes Consortium's is:
Evaluation Key: None or Not Applicable: • Minimal or In Progress: • Functional: • Fully Developed:
F-A-I-R Assessment
F-A-I-R, corresponds to the findable, accessible, interoperable and re-useable Principles (Wilkinson et al. 2016), which the RC strives to follow and to help facilitate making it easier for the riverscapes community to follow. F-A-I-R can apply to metadata, data and the tool itself.
FAIR Principle | Value | Evaluation | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
METADATA | |||
Findable | Desc. | Comments. | |
Available | Desc. | Comments. | |
Interoperable | Desc. | Comments. | |
Re-useable | Desc. | Comments. | |
DATA | |||
Findable | Desc. | Comments. | |
Available | Desc. | Comments. | |
Interoperable | Desc. | Comments. | |
Re-useable | Desc. | Comments. | |
TOOL | |||
Findable | Desc. | Comments. | |
Available | Desc. | Comments. | |
Interoperable | Desc. | Comments. | |
Re-useable | Desc. | Comments. |
Overall summary of tool FAIR-ness : Tool evaluation summary.
Tool Output Utility
All Riverscapes tools package up data in Riverscapes Projects. This section evaluates the utility of those outputs to end-users that are not running the tool, but instead leveraging its outputs.
Developer Intent
Development team (not evaluation team) should provide 1-3 paragraphs and/or some bullets and/or figures describing where they hope to go in future releases.
If you share the above vision, get in touch with the developers to support/fund the effort.